The Totalitarian Two-Step: How Gradualism Undermines Health and Sovereignty
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:29 am
The Totalitarian Two-Step: How Gradualism Undermines Health and Sovereignty
An Analysis of Incremental Control Over Food and Health Products
This entire process, which I call the totalitarian two-step, is a slow, incremental move toward a direction that the system wants us to go. When people push back, the system retreats slightly, but not as far as they started, meaning they're still gaining ground. They take three steps forward, and if there’s resistance, they move two steps back. If there’s no resistance, they take another three steps forward. This gives the appearance of retreating, but each time they are gaining ground. Over time, they just gain and gain and gain. I want to lay out how this strategy has been deployed in the realm of food and health, specifically using the example of Canada and the implementation of Codex Alimentarius.
The United Nations Food Code: Codex Alimentarius
Around 2003 or 2004, this thing was going on—an initiative I read about in Canada that was basically a local implementation of a much larger concept. At the United Nations, there was this thing called the United Nations Food Code, or Codex Alimentarius. This food code was brought in as an item of interest to be implemented around the world by all UN members.
Redefining Nutrition and Toxins
The fascinating and horrifying thing about Codex Alimentarius is that it completely redefined key terms. Within this framework, nutrition was redefined as toxins, and toxins were redefined as nutrition. These two words were deliberately switched.
The Worldwide Agenda
The implications of this redefinition are simple to understand but profound. When the United Nations spoke about increasing nutrition in food worldwide, they actually meant they were going to increase the amount of toxins in food worldwide. Conversely, when they said they were going to reduce the amount of toxins in food worldwide, it meant they were going to reduce the amount of nutrition. This general concept was implemented nation by nation, with the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and England all adopting it.
The Canadian Implementation of the Food Code
In a place like Canada, they go through this whole theater of showing up to the news cameras and saying they are going to do a cool initiative to make the world a better place for Canadians. They'd declare, "We're going to make sure there's maximum nutrition in food and we're going to reduce the toxins in food". This local iteration of the Codex Alimentarius was introduced as a bill.
Confusion by Design
They named it something like Bill C-60 or C-70. In the federal government, the bill numbers start at C1 and go up in sequence through the year, which is why it's very confusing to figure out what's going on. It is, of course, meant to be confusing.
The Backing Off
At the time the bill was fresh, people were actively against it. There were massive, wild protests by activists because the people in Canada understood they did not want their food supply poisoned—that was the underlying agenda. In year one and year two, due to these mass protests, the government backed off.
The New Name Strategy
Each year, the government would re-introduce the bill with a new name but the exact same wording. They just changed the title. This went on for three or four years in a row.
The Totalitarian Win
The fifth year, the people were distracted by something else, and there were no longer mass protests. And you know what happened then? It became Law in Canada. After the first, second, and third readings, it was law and received royal assent. Next thing you know, the Codex Alimentarius was fully implemented in Canada. Now, in Canada, when the government says they're going to increase the nutrition content of food, that means they're going to poison your food. And if they say they're going to reduce toxins in food, that means they're going to reduce the nutrition in your food. This is a depopulation program.
Targeting Health Products
At the same time, the government of Canada brought in a parallel legal structure for health products. Every health product was going to be reviewed by "Health Canada". Any product that failed to meet certain guidelines would be removed from the shelf. The government didn't say everything is illegal until it's legal; instead, they said everything is legal until we make it illegal.
The Phased Removal and Big Pharma
The catch is, they can only make illegal the number of products Health Canada can review, which is a certain volume per year. Tens of thousands of companies had products—derivatives from plants, vitamins, and other natural nutrients—that were very helpful for people's health and sold in health stores. The greatest offenders, those offensive to the pharmaceutical companies, were targeted first. The government was given a list of the top offenders—whose only offense was interfering with the profits of big pharma. They went through the list and removed the ability to legally sell these products in public health food stores in Canada.
The Consequences: Prescription Sales Skyrocket
The best-selling products that people were using to save their lives, such as Lugol's Health Drops or Heart Drops, which were hyper-concentrated, all-natural nutrition drops, were targeted. People were using these natural products rather than taking pharmaceuticals or signing up for surgeries. After these products were taken off the market, prescription drug sales went up through the roof, and people were signing up for surgeries that doctors told them they needed. Every year, thousands of products are removed from the shelves at the health food store and are replaced by government-authorized ones.
Replacing Effective Products with Ineffective Fillers
Look at a simple product like iodine. Not too long ago, you could buy high-grade, pure iodine, a mineral from a mine in South America, in high amounts per drop for a very cheap price. That product was replaced with a new one that has one one-hundredth the amount of iodine. The stuff is no longer red—it's clear. Iodine dyes everything red, but there is so little in the replacement product that the liquid is clear. The original product is now illegal; the replacement is legal, despite its ineffectiveness.
The Vitamin C Example
This trend of replacement extends to many products, like Vitamin C. I used to be very selective, buying a high-grade powder derived from organic tapioca. That product is now unavailable in Canada. The government says you don't need a one-gram capsule of pure Vitamin C powder because that's "too much" for you. So they take the one-gram capsule, and instead of 100% Vitamin C, it's now a fraction—for example, 10 milligrams of Vitamin C per gram capsule. The actual product contents are being reduced to almost nothing, and instead, you're buying fillers. You pay the same price but get one-hundredth or one-one hundred twentieth the actual active ingredients.
Private Membership Associations
The products that used to work are now illegal, and if you sell them publicly, you'll lose your business license, be fined, and face jail time. The only way to sell these things now is privately through Private Membership Associations (PMAs). People dealing with a health crisis can gain access to these products this way, but the government is making PMAs appear to be hidden from plain sight.
This incremental, yet relentless, process is what we're up against. In Canada, the structure is overt: they don't pretend to be a free country and are quick to punish those who disobey. The ongoing removal of effective natural health products and their replacement with ineffective, government-authorized fillers is leading to a state where, every year, the stores' products are turned over, with anything that used to work being replaced by a product that does not work. This strategy of the totalitarian two-step—gaining ground while appearing to retreat—is how they are quietly gaining complete control over the health and food choices of the population.