The Commercial Weaponization of 'Quarantine'
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:13 pm
The Commercial Weaponization of 'Quarantine'
A Look at the Hidden Mechanisms of Control and Compliance
The events surrounding the COVID-19 era starkly revealed the imposition of the "expert class". We saw governments implement a "terror program" under the pretense of consulting these experts, who, fascinatingly, all repeated the exact same information from the same source. This class of so-called experts, when questioned, often stammered, made things up, or simply admitted they didn't know, leading to a public disintegration of their authority. The core of the issue, and the focus of this discussion, is the deployment of protocols—masking, six-foot distancing, and constant hand sanitizing—that, if truly necessary, should have been standard for every flu season but were not. These new, unprecedented protocols were not about public health; they were a completely new "programming", a form of social and psychological control designed for "performance compliance".
The Imposition of the Expert Class
What was undeniable during COVID-19 was the sudden and overwhelming authority granted to the "expert class". These individuals were presented as the sole custodians of truth, yet they appeared to be simply repeating a pre-written script. They could not explain the information credibly or deviate from the script they were given. When confronted with basic, rational questions—like why masking or six-foot distancing hadn't been utilized during every previous flu season—the response was often "dead silence". Their inability to provide foundational answers exposed a deeply problematic dynamic where compliance was paramount, and the lack of scientific backing was irrelevant.
The Unquestioned New Protocols
The core of the "new programming" consisted of specific, rigid, and historically absent protocols: perpetual mask-wearing, mandatory six-foot distancing, and the excessive use of hand sanitizer. The absurdity of these rules was evident in the lack of explanation for their sudden necessity; if they worked, they should have been used for "every other flu in history". The requirement to "lather hand sanitizer all over yourself" became a near-religious ritual, turning compliance into the defining characteristic of what felt like joining a "cult".
Obedience and Performance Compliance
The real objective was not health, but "Obedience". People were compelled not just to adhere to the rules, but to be "seen doing the thing and seen by everyone doing the thing". This became "performance compliance". Questioning the lack of science behind the protocols—the masking, the hand sanitizer, the six-foot distancing—did not matter. The only thing that mattered was compliance. If an individual failed to perform the demands, they were immediately designated "the problem", with society around them verbally and otherwise reprimanding them.
The Mechanism of Mass Formation Psychosis
It became "pretty obvious" that what was occurring was "psychological programming". The sudden, universal adoption of these novel behaviors was, in fact, part of "entrainment protocols" designed to facilitate "mass formation psychosis". This process, necessary to change the deeply ingrained habits of a large population, requires a three-part combination: (1) social isolation, (2) making people afraid, and (3) presenting the required actions as the sole path out of the "fear spiral". This combination was systematically "unleashed across the world" during the pandemic.
Historical Precedents of Failed Isolation
Looking back, we see that concepts like masking and isolation have "been tried before and it has failed spectacularly". During the 1918 "Spanish flu," people were masking, but it did not save them. Historically, the theory of virology was based on isolating sick people to protect the healthy. The radical shift to isolating healthy people is a complete reversal of the model used for over 150 years. The current "fake quarantine," where non-si
ck individuals are isolated, simply "doesn't work that way".
Quarantine as a Commercial Tool
The very concept of quarantine has historical roots in commercial control. The word "quarantine," meaning four weeks, originated from maritime practice where ships arriving at port would be held for a period of time. This isolation, allegedly to check for sickness, was frequently used for commercial advantage. By using a "wink and the nod", politically connected individuals could force competing ships into a four-week quarantine. This deliberate delay allowed the connected interest to sell their own cargo for "maximum profits" with no competition. The "false premise of sickness" was—and remains—a potent commercial and market-control mechanism.
The Dangers of False Sickness Claims
False claims of sickness and the subsequent "quarantine" have an undeniable commercial and political utility. Beyond just eliminating competition, there were even opportunities for people to "purposely falsely claim quarantine and have their cargo spoil," then be paid by the insurance company for the entire shipment. The principle is clear: by leveraging a health crisis, or the manufactured idea of one, powerful interests can manipulate markets, preserve prices by preventing oversupply, and eliminate business rivals.
Conclusion: A Weapon of Compliance and Control
The COVID-19 protocols were a modern manifestation of an ancient commercial and psychological weapon: the "fake quarantine." What was witnessed was the deployment of entrainment protocols designed to enforce mass formation psychosis through fear, social isolation, and mandatory rituals. The expert class provided the façade of authority, but the ultimate goal was "obedience" and "performance compliance". By examining the historical use of quarantine as a commercial control mechanism, it becomes clear that the recent "new programming" was less about stopping a virus and more about asserting an unprecedented level of control, using the "false premise of sickness" to manipulate and coerce the masses.