The New Non-Tort: A Trojan Horse for the Courts
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2025 3:44 pm
The New Non-Tort: A Trojan Horse for the Courts
In my role as self represented litigant, I've made it my mission to observe and analyze the patterns that are emerging in our society, particularly in the legal and social arenas. What I'm seeing now is a new, subtle, and concerning trend: the promotion of new legal concepts, like "intimate partner violence," not merely as social causes but as the foundation for a new kind of tort. This isn't just about protecting people; it's about creating a new avenue for litigation in the courts, and it's something we need to recognize and understand before it becomes a fully ingrained part of our legal landscape.
Subsection 1: The Woke Echo Chamber
The first pattern I've noticed is the way these specific words and phrases are being introduced. I'm seeing them pop up all over the internet and social media, in the usual woke left circles. It's a coordinated effort, a linguistic campaign designed to normalize and legitimize a new idea. When I hear politicians start to echo these phrases, it's a clear signal. The repetition isn't just for emphasis; it's for public conditioning. They're trying to create a consensus, a feeling that this is a widespread and urgent problem that requires immediate and specific legislation. The goal isn't just to raise awareness, but to build a foundation for legal action.
Subsection 2: From Social Cause to Legal Claim
The next step in this pattern is the subtle shift from a social cause to a legal claim. The term "intimate partner violence" is a broad and, frankly, vague concept. It's not limited to physical harm, but can be applied to emotional distress, verbal disputes, and a whole host of other interpersonal conflicts. This vagueness is by design. A tort is a civil wrong that a court can provide a remedy for, usually through monetary compensation. By framing "intimate partner violence" as a tort, it opens the door for a flood of lawsuits. It turns domestic disputes, which were once handled privately or through criminal charges for clear acts of violence, into civil matters where one party can sue the other for damages.
Subsection 3: The Weaponization of the Legal System
This is where the true danger of this new concept lies. Our legal system is being used not as a tool for justice in cases of clear wrongdoing, but as a weapon in personal conflicts. The system isn't designed for these sorts of emotionally charged, subjective disputes. How do you quantify the harm of a specific word or an argument? How do you prove "emotional distress" in a way that can be objectively judged by a court? The subjective nature of this new tort makes it a perfect tool for those who want to use the legal system to harass or financially ruin someone they're in a conflict with. It turns the courts into a battleground for settling scores.
Subsection 4: The Role of Evidence and Truth
I'm a firm believer in evidence and truth. When I make a claim, I encourage others to look for evidence to support what I'm saying. That’s what I'm doing here. I'm encouraging you to see these patterns for yourself. In a tort case, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show that the defendant committed a wrong and that they were harmed as a direct result. With a tort as vague as "intimate partner violence," the evidence becomes murky. It's not about a smoking gun; it's about a he-said, she-said scenario that can easily be manipulated. It's a system that favors those who can best tell a story rather than those who can present objective facts.
Subsection 5: The Siloed and Shadowbanned Truth
This brings me to my final point about the reality of this situation. I speak about these things because I see what's coming. I see the specific patterns coming together, and I try to convey them to my audience. It's a truth that I'm being silenced for. I'm being "shadow banned" and "siloed" from every podcasting platform. It's a testament to the power of the institutions that are pushing these new legal concepts. They don't want an open discussion; they want a single narrative to dominate. But the truth is, the more they try to silence me, the more I know I'm on to something important. I'm just trying to plant a seed, to pique your interest to look for yourself.
Conclusion
The concept of "intimate partner violence" as a new non-tort is more than just a legal development; it's a social and political maneuver. From my perspective, it's an attempt to take highly subjective, emotional interpersonal conflicts and turn them into grounds for litigation. It’s a move that will likely lead to the weaponization of our legal system and the blurring of the lines between legitimate harm and personal disagreement. This essay is my way of trying to help you see the pattern, to understand what's coming, and to be a critical observer of these trends. This isn't about me asking you to believe me, but for you to simply be aware of these patterns and the potential they have to reshape our society. I believe you should investigate further for yourself to satisfy whether what I'm claiming is true or not.